Add eval system Phase 2 — rubric, expert prompts, judge skeleton ...

Drafts the v1 rubric (7 axes, anchors at 10/30/50/75/100, open scale),
three independent expert prompts (strict_critic / pragmatist / tech_lead)
that all return the same JSON shape, and the orchestration scaffolding:
schema.py (pydantic models), judge.py (rubric loader, score averaging,
fence-tolerant JSON parser, new_run_metadata), cli.py with argparse for
run / show / stats. Real LLM calls and transcript rendering land in
Phase 3 — the stubs raise NotImplementedError.

`python -m debug.eval` works as the entry point. Anchor `examples` are
left empty for now; user fills them with real session_ids later without
bumping rubric_version.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Add eval system Phase 1 — message feedback signal ...

Spec at docs/eval_system.md describes the full LLM-as-judge plan;
this commit lands only the in-app feedback layer:
- debug/eval/ Python package with EvalDB (asyncpg) and FastAPI router
  exposing /eval/feedback (set / clear / list)
- message_feedback postgres table keyed by (session_id, message_index)
- thumbs up / down on each completed assistant block in the webclient,
  optimistic update with rollback on failure

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>